tirsdag den 24. februar 2009

Odd WoMan Out

I am not going to offend my intelligent blog visitors by asking who is odd woman out here. But:

1) in your opinion, who is the ´real´ Miss Marple? - why?
2) which topical film role does the fourth woman play?

NB: I know Blogger does not work properly today - sorry if you want to comment but are not able to.

Look here for Miss Marple videos (Thank you, Kerrie)


















Jeg vil ikke fornærme mine intelligente besøgende ved at spørge, hvem det er, som ikke hører hjemme her. Men:

1) hvem er den ´rigtige´ Miss Marple efter din mening? - hvorfor?
2) hvilken (højaktuel) rolle spiller den fjerde kvinde?

NB: jeg ved der er tekniske vanskeligheder med Blogger i øjeblikket - beklager, hvis I gerne ville sende en kommentar. Håber problemerne snart er løst.

Se Miss Marple videoklip her. (Tak til Kerrie for dit link).

mandag den 23. februar 2009

Meet Chief Inspector Reg Wexford # 1.

The point of this post is not to review Ruth Rendell´s novels, but to scrutinize her long-standing detective, Reg Wexford, beginning in the 1960s. So for this first part I have re-read her four first crime novels - and chosen to let many of the quotations speak for themselves.

1) From Doon with Death (1964)
In this story of a missing woman and a madwoman in the attic, we meet Chief Inspector Reg Wexford for the very first time. "He was taller than Burden, thick-set without being fat, fifty-two years old, the very prototype of an actor playing a top-brass policeman." Wexford is a local man who knows all and sundry in the area, a very competent detective, but not necessarily a patient or sympathetic man. He even ridicules his subordinates´ ideas when he thinks they are irrelevant to the investigation, and obviously enjoys provoking his sidekick Mike Burden now and then, "´They´re having a real humdingin´ affair,´ Wexford interrupted, ´knocking it off in the back of his jag.´ Burden was shocked."

Like many other fictional detectives, Wexford knows his classics and often quotes poetry. Besides he seems to be a connoisseur of lipstick and women´s scents which proves very useful in the first books. The reader knows that he is a married man, but does not know anything else about his family life.

In the first novel Wexford uses Sherlock Holmes´ well-known method of gathering people around him to tell them what happened and how, and when he has found his murderer he can afford to be kind. Thus a rising crime star was born - though the characters have not quite achieved their full potential in this debut.

2) A New Lease of Death (1967 - aka Sins of the Fathers).
A man called Painter was hung for murder 15 years ago. Now his daughter´s father-in-law-to-be, a village vicar playing the amateur sluth, tries to prove that Painter did not do it. Throughout the novel Reg Wexford is angry that anyone thinks he didn´t get his first murder case right!

This is how Mike Burden describes his fifty-five-year-old superior. "He turned round when he heard Wexford come in. The Chief Inspector´s heavy grey face was a little greyer than usual, but he showed no other sign of tiredness and his eyes, dark and hard as basalt, showed a gleam of triumph. He was a big man with big features and a big intimidating voice. His grey suit - one of a series of low fastening, double-breasted affairs - appeared more shabby and wrinkled than ever today. But it suited Wexford, being not unlike an extension of his furrowed pachydermatous skin."

In this novel we are reminded that Wexford is a married man. He has been working overnight, and finally his wife is forced to disturb him. "´My wife,´ he said. ´Am I dead? Have I forgotten I´ve got a home of my own? She´s run out of housekeeping and she can´t find the cheque book.´ He chuckled, felt in his pocket and produced it. ´No wonder. I´ll have to nip back.´"

An important theme of the story is the old, class-ridden Britain. Wexford meets upper-class people and Oxford graduates with distrust and prejudices, but he cannot refute the vicar´s belief that criminal tendencies are inherited. He asks himself, "If he had been asked to predict the future of such a one as Theresa Painter [the murderer´s daughter], what would he have foreseen for her? ... he supposed he would have counted her lucky to have become an anonymous manual worker with perhaps already a couple of petty convictions." Another aspect of the class theme is the number of children who came down in the world because the provider of the family died untimely.

The 1960s were not a politically correct era, either. In a restaurant, Wexford "took the menu, scowling. ´Look at that, Polynesian chicken. What do they think we are, aborigines?´" Still, Wexford shows more signs of being kind and sympathetic than in the first book.

3) Wolf to the Slaughter (1967)
Important characters are a naive young woman, a man who enjoys toying with sharp knives, plus a wealthy, but immoral woman who disappears. We also come across a new generation of casually dressed people who are into modern music and arts ... to be frowned upon by proper citizens. Young police officers are not even what they were, and Mike Burden struggles to hide his envy when Wexford calls the new man at the station, young, besodded Drayton, by his first name.

This is also the book where Mike Burden begins to develop a distinct personality. "The tea was sugarless because Burden preferred it that way, not from motives of self-denial. His figure remained lean naturally, no matter what he ate, and his greyhound´s face thin and ascetic. Conservative in dress, he was wearing a new suit this morning, and he flattered himself that he looked like a broker on holiday." Whatever Burden may think, he tends to come across as a rather moral and censorious family man. A typical Burdenism, "That means adultery, and a man who´ll commit it once will commit it again."

Wexford is his elephantine self in a ´hideous grey overcoat which would never be at the cleaner's during cold spells because it was never cleaned.´ - says Burden. Though not well-dressed, he is the more generous, understanding and imaginative police officer, who even goes to the station on his days off. He fully acknowledges Burden´s talents, however, - perhaps without saying it aloud. Again, there is no information whatsoever about Mrs Wexford, but Wexford tells his young daughter Sheila to invite Drayton to one of her noisy get-togethers.

4) The Best Man to Die (1969)
This story takes off when Jack Pertwee is about to get married, but his best man and very close friend, Charlie Hatton, never turns up. Instead we are properly introduced to Wexford´s family at last.

"Detective Chief Inspector Wexford didn´t care for dogs." Nevertheless he ends up taking Clytemnestra, a ´grey thing with ears like knitted dishcloths´ for a walk, because his daughter Sheila is preoccupied with her hair.
"´Where did Sheila get it from?´ Wexford said gloomily.
Mrs Wexford was a woman of few words. ´Sebastian.´
´Who in God´s name is Sebastian?´
´Some boy,´ said Mrs Wexford. ´He´s only just gone.´"

Moments later we catch Wexford musing on the looks of his family. "His daughter´s beauty had never ceased to surprise the chief inspector. Sylvia´, the elder married one, was well-built and healthy, but that was the best that could be said for her; Mrs Wexford had a magnificent figure and a fine profile although she had never been of the stuff that wins beauty contests. While he... All he needed, he sometimes thought, was a trunk to make him look exactly like an elephant."

This admirer of female beauty is less generous when it comes to their inner qualities, however. "Moreover, now that she [the dog] had achieved the heart´s desire for which she had turned on her shameless, neurotic display, she had become detecjed, and walked along meekly, head and tail hanging. Just like a woman, Wexford thought crossly. ... When you get what you want you don´t want what you get ..."

So we learn quite a bit about the whole family and Wexford as a person in this one, including his fear of lifts. On the whole Mrs Wexford comes across as the little middle-class housewife who neither needs much personality nor a first name. Yet it is clear that she is a patient and phlegmatic person:
"´What would you do,´Wexford said to his wife, ´if I brought a young girl home and offered you a thousand pounds to let her stay?´
´You haven´t got a thousand pounds,´ said Mrs Wexford."

Reg Wexford may seem more of a male chauvinist than for example Lord Peter Wimsey, but he is also a police officer who has experienced more than his share of crime and violence. Here he speaks out against physical punishment of children:
"Ever heard of the pill? ... Having kids is a privilege, a joy, or it should be, and by God, I´ll get the County down on you if I see you strike that boy of yours on the head again!"

Small wonder that this father worries about his beautiful daughter and wishes to see her ´safely married´. Altogether, Reg Wexford begins to look like a real character of flesh and blood though he is still very much a product of a time before new-fangled ideas about youth rebellions and equal rights for women and other minorities.

søndag den 22. februar 2009

Your Blog is Fabulous Award

I received this cool award from Sherrie, Just Books. Thanks a lot, Sherrie, I have admired this pretty one whenever I came across someone who had got it.

My five nominees are:
Louise, Lou´s Pages
Kerrie, Mysteries in Paradise
Reg, Stieg Larsson´s English translator
Ruth, Buzz ´Bout Books & More
Bibliophile, (Another) 52 books.

Feel free to pass the award on to five newbie blogs you have read lately.


This very professionel "scam" was concocted by Maxine, Petrona. The reading room for heavily addicted crime fiction folks is to be found here.

lørdag den 21. februar 2009

Five Questions Interview

- a meme from Kim (Sophisticated Dorkiness)

1. Who is your favorite book character? Why?
- I have just scrolled down the list of crime novels I own to make sure I really mean this, but there is no real doubt that the answer must be Adam Dalgliesh, P.D. James´ gentleman detective since 1962 (Cover her Face).
Wikipedia indicates that P.D. James was inspired by Jane Austen´s character, Mr Darcy, because Dalgliesh is “tall, dark and handsome”. On the other hand, Dalgliesh also drives a Jaguar so in spite of some physical differences I have always suspected that Dorothy Sayer´s Peter Wimsey must be a source of inspiration, especially after Dalgliesh´ falling in love with Emma Lavenham.
- And why? Perhaps it is too easy to say “because he is loveable”? I don´t remember which P.D. James novel I read first, or if I actually came across Roy Marsden before reading about my hero, but I am quite certain that part of what appealed to me was the sad story about the death of his wife and newborn child. Basically, Adam Dalgliesh embodies the British gentleman in my eyes - a very private person, but still someone who reads great literature and is thoughtful and considerate (whenever his job allows him to be so).

2. If you were going to be stuck on a desert island, what three books would you want to take with you?
- The first one is easy: Barbara Vine, The Chimney Sweeper´s Boy (wonderful psychological thriller)
The second is Charles Dickens, Our Mutual Friend (a classic novel, but also crime)
Finally, I have chosen Colin Dexter, The Remorseful Day (even though it is so sad).

Perhaps you wonder why P.D. James does not appear on this list. She would probably be no four or five. Even though Dalgliesh is such a favourite character of mine, I would find it difficult to pick just one of the novels about him. Perhaps “Shroud for a Nightingale” because the antagonist is also such an interesting character.

3. What is one element that makes an amazing crime fiction novel?
- the one element which really singles out the best crime novels is the carefully planned plot, obviously. So the perfect crime novel is one with a satisfactory, convincing plot and some surprising twists. Yet, without credible characters and an interesting environment it would hardly be first class, however.

4. You blog in two languages, which is super cool! What language do you think most of your readers speak?
- I checked my "SiteMeter" which shows me that the number of British & American readers and that of Scandinavian readers is just about fifty-fifty. (See graphics below). I soon realized that if I blogged in Danish only, I would lose a whole world of interesting English-speaking readers (and all their kind comments), and if I should ever decide to give up a language it would be Danish as most of my Scandinavian readers are quite competent readers and writers of English.

5. Have you ever read a book that changed your opinion about a political or social issue?
- Well, a social issue, perhaps, but never political. What reading great fiction (criminal or not) gives me is an insight in human beings. In Ken Kesey´s excellent novel, “One Flew Over the Cuckoo´s Nest” (1962) the deaf-and-dumb Indian narrator says, ““But it´s the truth even if it didn´t happen.” So literature which changes the world is stories which seem to be more true than real life. A crime fiction author who takes up social issues is Ruth Rendell. A striking example is her novel “Simisola” (1994) which deals with the horrible living conditions of illegal immigrants.

Kim, thank you for your excellent, thought-provoking questions.

Does anyone out there want to participate in this meme? - just send me a comment “I want to be interviewed” - and I shall try to come up with some good questions for you.

Graphics: the language of my latest 100 guests

Interview - fem spørgsmål.

- stillet af Kim fra Sophisticated Dorkiness

1. Hvem er din litterære yndlings-person?
- Jeg har lige checket mine egne krimier for at være helt sikker, men der er egentlig ingen tvivl om, at det er Adam Dalgliesh, P.D. James´ detektiv-gentleman, som kom til verden i 1962 (Dæk ansigtet til - oversat til dansk i 1989).
Ifølge Wikipedia fandt P.D. James sin inspiration fra Jane Austens hovedperson Mr Darcy (Stolthed og Fordom - 1813), fordi Dalgliesh er “høj, mørk og flot”. På den anden side kører Dalgliesh også Jaguar, så på trods af fysiske forskelle, har jeg altid forestillet mig, at James har skævet lidt til Dorothy Sayers´ Lord Peter Wimsey, især efter at Dalgliesh har forelsket sig i Emma Lavenham.

Hvorfor? Måske er det for nemt at sige “fordi Dalgliesh er en elskelig person”? Jeg kan ikke huske, hvilken P.D. James-roman jeg læste først, eller om jeg stødte på TV-skuespilleren Roy Marsden før bog-versionen, men noget af det, der oprindeligt appellerede til mig var den sørgelige historie om hans kone og nyfødte søn, som døde. Først og fremmest er Adam Dalgliesh den fuldendte, engelske gentleman i mine øjne - et meget reserveret menneske, som holder af god litteratur og er eftertænksom og hensynsfuld (når jobbet tillader det).

2. Hvis du havnede på en øde ø, hvilke tre bøger ville du så gerne have med?
- Den første bog er nem nok: Barbara Vine, Skorstensfejerens dreng (fantastisk psykologisk thriller).
Nummer to er Charles Dickens, Vor fælles ven (en klassiker, men også en krimi)
Som nummer tre har jeg valgt Colin Dexter, Et kors for Morse (selv om den er så sørgelig)

Og nu er der måske nogen som undrer sig over, at P.D. James ikke er med på listen. Hun ville nok være nummer fire eller fem. Selv om Adam Dalgliesh er min yndlings-person, ville jeg have svært ved at vælge bare én af romanerne om ham. Måske er den bedste “Døde nattergale”, fordi morderen også er en ganske spændende person.

3. Nævn ét element, som skaber en fantastisk krimi.
- det ene element, som virkelig adskiller fantastiske krimier fra de andre, er det vel-tilrettelagte plot. Den perfekte krimi har et tilfredsstillende plot og nogle overraskende drejninger undervejs. Men uden troværdige personer og et interessant miljø, kan bogen selvfølgelig aldrig være i første klasse.

4. Det er superflot, at du blogger på to sprog. Hvilket sprog tror du de fleste af dine læsere taler?
- Min tæller "SiteMeter" viser mig, at antallet af engelsktalende læsere og skandinaver er omtrent lige højt. Det gik snart op for mig, at hvis jeg kun bloggede på dansk, ville jeg gå glip af en hel verden af spændende, engelsk-talende gæster (og alle deres venlige kommentarer), så hvis jeg bliver træt af at blogge på to sprog, vil det være dansk, som ryger, eftersom de fleste af mine skandinaviske besøgende klarer sig fint på engelsk.

5. Har du nogensinde læst en bog, som ændrede din mening om et politisk eller socialt emne?
- Socialt, måske, men aldrig politisk. Hvad jeg får ud af at læse stor litteratur (krimier eller andre genrer) er indsigt i menneskers liv og færden. I Ken Keseys fremragende roman, "Gøgereden" (1971) siger den døvstumme, indianske fortæller: "Men det er sandheden, selv om det ikke skete." Så litteratur, som kan forandre verden, er historier som forekommer mere sande end det virkelige liv. En krimiforfatter som ofte beskæftiger sig med sociale emner er Ruth Rendell. Et oplagt eksempel er romanen "Simisola" (1995), som handler om illegale indvandrere og deres forfærdelige livsvilkår.

Kim, tak for dine fremragende, tankevækkende spørgsmål.
Er der nogen derude, som kunne tænke sig at blive interviewet? - bare send mig en kommentar og skriv "jeg vil gerne interviewes" - og jeg skal prøve at lave nogle gode spørgsmål.

fredag den 20. februar 2009

Ann Cleeves, The Crow Trap (1999)

- denne britiske krimi er desværre ikke oversat til dansk -
Reviewed as part of my 2009 thriller and suspense reading challenge (eco thriller).

“Bella had arranged her suicide as efficiently as she had done everything else in her life. In the torchlight she swung, hanging from a noose made of strong, nylon rope. Her face was white. She had prepared for the occasion by putting on lipstick and the silk top Rachael had bought her as a thank-you present after last season. Her black shoes shone so the torchlight reflected from them. She´d pulled two bales away from the wall and climbed onto them to tie the rope round a beam. Then, when she was ready, she had kicked one away.”

In this crime novel Ann Cleeves switches among the point of view of four women. The first voice is Rachael Lambert, the friend who discovers Bella´s body, and the team leader of an environmental survey near Kimmerston in Northumberland National Park. Rachael´s ambition is to be a confident and assertive leader, but at the same time she is afraid to appear rude. On the whole, Rachael struggles to find her own feet professionally as well as privately. She has had an affair with Peter Kemp, her boss, a man too charming to be true, but when Rachael met him, she was too young or romantic to see this.

We also follow Rachael´s team members, Anne Preece and Grace Fulwell. The three very different women do not really hit it off, to say the least. Anne Preece is a confident and reckless botanist who has had a number of affairs because her homosexual husband cannot satisfy her. She despices Rachael and regards Grace as a stuck-up madwoman.

Grace Fulwell is a pale young woman who prefers to keep her own company. In her chapters we learn that as a lonely foster child she “had to pretend at failure to be accepted at all by the other kids at school” and that she considers animals and facts easier to handle than human beings.

As Rachael cannot come to terms with Bella´s suicide, she engages her bossy and enterprising mother Edie to help her find out what lies behind. She realizes that she did not know Bella at all, and that the quiet, unobtrusive farmer´s wife has a tragic past, but Rachael and Edie do not make any real progress until a second woman dies.

We are not properly introduced to Vera Stanhope, the fourth and final voice, until nearly half-way through the book, but this remarkable woman is certainly worth waiting for.First of all, it is quite refreshing to meet a female detective who is more like a bag lady than a dainty beauty queen. Vera Stanhope does not do much to placate the people around her, either, in her direct, nearly sarcastic manner, “... if I do have a reputation for eccentricity, I have one too for getting results”

Just like Stephen Booth´s Ben Cooper and Diane Fry series, the hostile and dangerous environment plays an important role. An interesting, recurrent symbol is the crow trap with its live bait. It takes a long time, however, before the reader is able to figure out who is the bait and who is supposed to walk into the trap.

Vera Stanhope does get her results in the end, though, even if she is not at all as certain as she pretends, and after this first thrilling meeting with the grim landscape and characters of Northumberland this reader certainly craves for more! This is an unusually promising ´first in a series´.


Photo: sheep from Northumberland National Park

onsdag den 18. februar 2009

DJs Bait in the Box # 5

[This week´s rather unusual tin belongs to Elizabeth, Thoughts from an Evil Overlord]

A quotation from a British book which is the first in a series:
"When the ambulance, the doctor and the undertaker had driven away in convoy she was left with the young policeman. He watched the tail lights of the other vehicles disappear into the darkness with a sort of wistfulness, as if he were being abandoned, then he said: ´Do you know if there´s any booze in the house?´"

The rules:
If you recognize the quotation, or if you think you are able to guess who wrote it, please post a comment. Just leave a hint, do not spoil the fun by giving too much away.

Gæt en bog # 5

Denne engelske krimi, som er den første i en serie, er endnu ikke oversat til dansk:

"Da ambulancen, lægen og bedemanden var kørt væk i konvoj, stod hun tilbage med den unge politibetjent. Han så baglygterne på de andre køretøjer forsvinde i mørket med en slags vemodighed, som om han blev efterladt, og så sagde han: ´Ved I, om der er noget sprut i huset?´"


Reglerne:
Hvis du kan genkende citatet, eller hvis du tror du kan gætte hvem forfatteren er, så læg venligst en kommentar. Skriv bare et hint til nye besøgende, lad være med at ødelægge fornøjelsen for andre.

tirsdag den 17. februar 2009

Blog Improvement Project # 4 - what is a blog?

[Kim, Sophisticated Dorkiness]
This week, blog basics are in focus. As I am reasonably satisfied with my six-week-old blog, I think it is too early for major changes. Instead, these are my musings about where I am right now.

When I started out two things were clear:
1) I was going to write about crime fiction and related subjects. (I do digress when Kim or some of my geeky friends tempt me, but not too often, I think)
2) I wanted to write in English and Danish.

Obviously, I also wanted people to see my blog and to comment. Recently, I put my little feedjit down in the right hand corner (which tells me where my visitors come from) so I know that I have around thirty guests per day. That is okay for a new blog, I think. Now and then I also google "DJs krimiblog" and conclude that google likes me :D

With regard to comments, it is clear that when I write short and humorous posts with interesting pictures, I get good response. It seems that people also appreciate my ´article posts´ (e.g. this one about the Scandinavian femikrimi), and my Bait-in-the-Box posts go down really well when the book is not too obscure. My reviews are the ones which get the least response on the blog itself; on the other hand I discuss reviews and other crime related subjects in my crime and mystery fiction room which is a place where I feel well integrated among nerds of my own kind.

Besides, I have found quite a large number of fellow bloggers whose blogs I really enjoy - many crime fiction readers obviously - but also people who read other genres or whose blogs I just enjoy for social reasons.

Finally, many English-speaking visitors comment on my bilingual blog, and generally, even though I have just as many Danish visitors as foreigners most days, the English-speaking ones leave more comments. Thank you; they are much appreciated!

- and should you have suggestions which you think would improve my blog, please leave a comment.

Blog Improvement Project # 4 - hvad er en blog?

[Kim, Sophisticated Dorkiness]
Denne uges projekt går ud på at se på de grundlæggende sider ved ens blog. Eftersom jeg er nogenlunde tilfreds med min seks uger gamle blog, tror jeg det er for tidligt at foretage større ændringer. Jeg har i stedet valgt at filosofere lidt over, hvor jeg står lige netop nu.

Da jeg begyndte at blogge, lå to ting fast:
1) Jeg ville skrive om krimier og lignende emner. (Jeg snyder af og til, når spændende bloggere som Kim og mine Weekly Geeks-venner frister mig, men vist ikke alt for tit).
2) Jeg ville skrive på engelsk og dansk.

Selvfølgelig ville jeg også gerne have folk til at lægge mærke til min blog, og kommentere. For nylig installerede jeg min lille feedjit i nederste højre hjørne (den fortæller mig, hvor mine besøgende kommer fra), så jeg ved, at jeg har omkring 30 gæster dagligt. Det er vist okay for så ny en blog. En gang imellem googler jeg også "DJs krimiblog", og hver gang tænker jeg, at google i hvert fald har set mig :D

Med hensyn til kommentarer, så er det tydeligt, at når jeg skriver korte og humoristiske indlæg med interessante billeder, får jeg masser af respons, og mine Gæt-en-bog-indlæg går fint, når bogen ikke er alt for svær. Det ser også ud til, at mine læsere værdsætter mine ´artikler´ (f.eks. den skandinaviske femikrimi). Mine anmeldelser får færrest kommentarer på selve bloggen, men på den anden side diskuterer jeg anmeldelser og krimier generelt i mit "crime and mystery fiction room", hvor jeg virkelig føler mig vel-integreret blandt nørder af min egen slags.

Desuden har jeg jo mødt en masse andre bloggere hvis blogs jeg virkelig nyder - selvfølgelig en masse krimilæsere - men også mennesker som læser andre genrer, eller hvis blogs jeg slet og ret nyder af sociale grunde.

Og endelig, så er der mange engelsktalende gæster som roser min tosprogede blog, og generelt kommenterer de mere end danske gæster. Jeg ved ikke helt hvorfor, men det kan nogle af mine danske besøgende måske fortælle mig?

- og hvis du skulle have forslag til forbedringer af min blog, så læg endelig en kommentar.